- #The firm 2009 film itunes movie#
- #The firm 2009 film itunes software#
- #The firm 2009 film itunes download#
Apple has even baked DRM into its computers: The video ports on new MacBooks check to see whether an external monitor obeys copy-protection standards.
#The firm 2009 film itunes movie#
Buy a movie from iTunes and you’re stuck playing it on stuff made by Apple-iTunes, iPods, iPhones, or Apple TV devices. The computer and consumer electronics industry- not least of all, Apple-continues to build restrictive copy-protection into hardware and software. (True, you can remove iTunes’ restrictions by burning songs to CDs and then re-ripping them to your computer-but that’s a hassle, and it degrades your music quality.) But despite the changes at the iTunes store, it would be a mistake to see the Apple announcement as the beginning of the end of DRM. Under the old regime, every purchase was a Faustian bargain-when you pressed “Buy” on iTunes, you were committing yourself ever-more tightly to using Apple’s products long into the future. In return, Apple will let the industry sell songs at three different prices-69 cents, 99 cents, or $1.29, rather than today’s universal 99-cent price.įor music lovers, this is fantastic news. The labels agreed to give up DRM on all songs sold on iTunes-within a few months, you’ll be able to copy every song in the store to an unlimited number of computers, and you’ll be able to play any song on any device, Apple or non-Apple. The labels, finally seizing the upper hand, declined to offer the same DRM-free deal to Apple until it agreed to institute flexible prices. Because it carries no restrictions, music from Amazon’s store could work on Apple’s devices-and, thus, Amazon looked like it might pose a threat to the iTunes Store’s dominance. Last year, the industry tried another strategy to reduce Apple’s power-record companies gave up one of their most prized demands, copy protection, in order to let Amazon set up a DRM-free online music store. The record companies had little choice but to go along.
#The firm 2009 film itunes download#
Jobs, arguing that raising prices would push people to download music illegally, rejected this proposal, forcing labels to a single storewide price. Under their plan, hot new releases would sell for as much as $1.49, while back-catalog standards would sell for less than 99 cents.
By 2005, many in the industry wanted to adjust the price of songs on iTunes based on their popularity.
In particular, the labels lost one of the most important rights any business enjoys-the ability to pick the price of its goods.
#The firm 2009 film itunes software#
The irony was delicious, even poetic, the industry hoisted with its own petard: By demanding DRM, the labels had tied their songs to a single hardware and software platform and had inadvertently given Steve Jobs total control over their business. Suddenly everybody had one-and the only place to buy music for the iPod was through iTunes, which would go on to become the most popular music retailer in the country. At first, these last two restrictions sat well with the recording industry keeping downloaded songs tied to the iPod would limit piracy, the labels believed. In addition, iTunes songs would not work with non-Apple hardware and software, and Apple’s devices wouldn’t accept copy-protected songs purchased from most other online stores. Apple assuaged these fears by creating a “ digital rights management” plan called FairPlay, which prevented customers from putting songs on more than five different computers or from burning any playlist more than seven times.
Having been burned by Napster, music biz bigwigs were understandably concerned that putting MP3s up “for sale” would be tantamount to giving away their catalogs to music-thieving college students. In return for letting Apple build up its inventory, the labels needed assurances that iTunes wouldn’t be a haven for piracy.
0 kommentar(er)
